Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3

* Kristian Benoit <[email protected]> wrote:

> "plain" run:
> 
> Measurements   |   Vanilla   |  preemp_rt     |
> ---------------+-------------+----------------+
> fork           |      93us   |  157us (+69%)  |
> open/close     |     2.3us   |  3.7us (+43%)  |
> execve         |     351us   |  446us (+27%)  |
> select 500fd   |    12.7us   | 25.8us (+103%) |
> mmap           |     660us   | 2867us (+334%) |
> pipe           |     7.1us   | 11.6us (+63%)  |

update: these tests should perform significantly better on the freshly 
released -50-37 (or later) PREEMPT_RT kernels. (fork, execve, mmap [*] 
was improved in -50-36, the others in -50-37)

	Ingo

[*] the extent of the above fork/execve/mmap costs is still unexplained, 
    unless the test was run with HIGHMEM64 and HIGHPTE enabled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
    • From: Kristian Benoit <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: page allocation/attributes question (i386/x86_64 specific)
• Next by Date: Re: Handle kernel page faults using task gate
• Previous by thread: Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
• Next by thread: [PATCH] vfree() cleanup in drivers/net/bsd_comp.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]