On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:14 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this was balanced, there is a get very early on when the
> error is detected. But I'll review.
>
> > I'd keep that in arch code for now.
>
> OK, I'm moving it there. It did seem both confusing and semi-pointless
> after the last round of changes.
Well, it's logical for the get and put to be in the same "layer" don't
you think ?
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
