Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:03:08AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Why should he compile with CONFIG_SMP when CONFIG_SMP is absolutely
> unnecessary without preempt-RT?

Because I'm the Anti-Ingo and say so.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
    • From: Kristian Benoit <[email protected]>
  • Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SPAM: Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout
• Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
• Previous by thread: Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
• Next by thread: Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]