Quoting Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:25:03AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > Search the archives. > > There was a thread about this some time ago. > > that doesn't make it a good idea I did not say that. Indeed I say it's a bad idea. And that was also the conclusion in the other thread I talked about. I only gave this example here, because people often think xml parsers are big with many lines of code. This one is only about 500 lines. But still, please don't put such unneccessary bloat into the kernel. ;) > > xmlparser.h: > > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/pwmanager/1.2/pwmanager/pwmanager_dump/xmlparser.h?rev=416745&view=markup > > xmlparser.c: > > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/pwmanager/1.2/pwmanager/pwmanager_dump/xmlparser.c?rev=417577&view=markup > > all this tells me is that some desktop application programmer wants to > put XML into the kernel not me. ;) -- Greetings, Michael
Attachment:
pgptbldCHAa83.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Build-in XML support?
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: Build-in XML support?
- References:
- Build-in XML support?
- From: Ville Sundell <[email protected]>
- Re: Build-in XML support?
- From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
- Re: Build-in XML support?
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Build-in XML support?
- Prev by Date: Re: struct class question
- Next by Date: Re: Build-in XML support?
- Previous by thread: Re: Build-in XML support?
- Next by thread: Re: Build-in XML support?
- Index(es):
 |