Re: Xtensa syscalls (Was: Re: 2.6.12-rc5-mm1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Zankel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The question is, if we had to break glibc compatibility, shouldn't we 
>  use the opportunity to clean-up the syscall list? It was copied from 
>  MIPS and, thus, has inherited a lot of legacy from there. As a new 
>  architecture, maybe we should even go as far as removing all ni-syscalls 
>  and start fresh?

If you can cope with having the syscalls renumbered then yes, that would be
good.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux