* Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo, what's the status of putting irq 0 back in a thread with
> PREEMPT_RT? IIRC this had some adverse (maybe unfixable?) effects so
> it was disabled a few months ago.
the jury is still out on that one - but right now it seems it's too much
complexity for a handful of usecs of latency improvement. Especially
with things like high-resolution timer support, the threading IRQ0
doesnt seem to be worth it.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
