Hi, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:17:17AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Come to think of it, it could be a problem if the comnpiler was silly and
>> built an entire temporary on the stack and the copied it over. Hopefull it
>> won't do that.
>
> that patch is fine except for the second to last patch which should be
> droped.
If you do that, you also need to drop the third-to-last patch ...
Personally, I think struct assignments are fine if the compiler
does them right. As this example shows, at least they avoid the
I-forgot-to-zero-the-struct problem. ;-)
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [email protected]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
First Rule of History:
History doesn't repeat itself -- historians merely repeat each other.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
