Re: [PATCH 2/3] freevxfs: minor cleanups

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 07:20:21AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> The rationale for this is that since NULL is not guaranteed to be zero
> by the C standard, memset() doesn't really initialize pointers properly.

For all the machines we care it does. If a maintainer refuses to acccept
that he or she is stupid.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: freevxfs: minor cleanups
    • From: "Pekka J Enberg" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] freevxfs: minor cleanups
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] freevxfs: minor cleanups
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] freevxfs: fix buffer_head leak
• Next by Date: RE: accessing loopback filesystem+partitions on a file
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] freevxfs: minor cleanups
• Next by thread: Re: freevxfs: minor cleanups
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]