Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Jun 28, 2005, at 20:25:02, Sean wrote:
there will be a price to pay if the linux community fragments over choice 
of scm.
I don't agree. With the current set of SCMs, I don't think it will be long before somebody invents a gitweb/Mercurial/whatever gateway, such that I can 
"hg serve" from my Mercurial repository and have Linus "git pull" from a
multiprotocol bridge.


the good news is that we're no longer locked into the whims of
some proprietary system. so it should be straight forward for those who choose any tool to work with those who've chosen another. this is already evidenced by the fact that the git repository is pulled and re- exeported 
with mecurial.


I agree completely!  Cheers to the end of proprietary revision storage!
anyway, all the best, just wish you guys would spend less time trying to 
convert git users and more time advancing your own tool.
A project with no users isn't much of a project, now is it? In any case, this thread has long since passed its usefulness, so let's let it die, ok? 

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

--
I lost interest in "blade servers" when I found they didn't throw knives at people who weren't supposed to be in your machine room. 
  -- Anthony de Boer

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux