On Jun 28, 2005, at 18:23:09, Sean wrote:
Git is still developing, there will be new ways to seek and cache
things
etc eventually that remove any performance issue. Git gets this
right, it
concentrates on what is important, stays flexible and trusts that
down the
road as things mature any performance problems can be dealt with.
Have you tried (or even looked at) Mercurial? I'm now using it for four
different projects that used to be in CVS and I'm loving it.
It already has some tools that are better than BK ever had (gitk,
gitweb,
etc..)
Likewise for Mercurial, except that IMHO, a from-scratch Mercurial
pull via
HTTP + Mercurial checkout is faster than a BK or GIT checkout alone.
And
then there's the fact that it stores the whole mess in a fraction of the
space used by git.
Please, just _try_ it first. You'll like it, I promise. (It's also a
much smaller codebase too)
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
I lost interest in "blade servers" when I found they didn't throw
knives at people who weren't supposed to be in your machine room.
-- Anthony de Boer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
