On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:01:36PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Can the folks submitting all of the kprobe stuff at least consult me
> when they can't figure out how to implement the sparc64 kprobe variant
> for new features?
>
> Currently, the sparc64 build is broken by recent kprobe
> changes:
>
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
> : undefined reference to `arch_init'
>
> Also, can we use a more namespace friendly name for this kprobe layer
> specific function other than "arch_init()"?
>
> Thanks.
Sorry, just an oversight. We have several arch_* functions, maybe we should
start using kprobes_arch_* instead.
--rusty
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
