Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386

Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:

> the kernel afs doesnt' seem to need a special syscall....

As I mentioned in a previous message, I believe the in-kernel AFS
supports neither writing nor authentication, making it hardly a viable
replacement of the out-of-kernel OpenAFS for most AFS users.  I believe
OpenAFS requires the system call in order to support authentication.

-- 
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
    • From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: recent kprobe work
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mostly_read data section
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]