Hello,
> So far you are right with your assumptions, I hope my explanation just
> made it a bit clearer.
Yes. It was really nice organization of whole thing.
>The whole decapsulation is done in xfrm4_rcv_encap, except in case of
>nat-traversal, where udp_rcv comes into play.
>After the whole xfrm processing is done the packet is put back into the
>network stack as it would look like without being ever processed by IPSec
>(almost :-).
I have a doubt regarding nat-traversal. Let me first admit that I
don't have a perfect understanding of the NAT traversal concept. I
heard that IPSec is kept in a UDP packet and sent. How does the tx
side processing happen (the host from which the udp encapsulated ipsec
packet originated). The last call in the stackable destination is
ip_output() as you said.
How does it go back to udp(transport) layer in this case.
S.Kartikeyan
http://www.geocities.com/kartikeyans/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
