Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch 25/38] CKRM e18: Add fork rate control to the numtasks controller

Hi Chandra,

Chandra Seetharaman wrote:

> It is not a limit, it is the system level number of tasks assumed by the
> numtasks controller, so, it cannot be a _no limit_, it has to be real
> number.

If the magic numner 131072 is not hard coded in the numtask source code
and copied from the kernel parameter in runtime, it makes sense.
But, copying magic number is ugly.

Thanks,
MAEDA Naoaki

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/38] CKRM e18: Updated core patches to 2.6.12 and included e17 changes
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>
  • [patch 25/38] CKRM e18: Add fork rate control to the numtasks controller
    • From: Gerrit Huizenga <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch 25/38] CKRM e18: Add fork rate control to the numtasks controller
    • From: Naoaki Maeda <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch 25/38] CKRM e18: Add fork rate control to the numtasks controller
    • From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6] Altix - add ioc3 serial driver support
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch 25/38] CKRM e18: Add fork rate control to the numtasks controller
• Next by thread: [patch 14/38] CKRM e18: undo removal of check in numtasks_put_ref_local
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]