Re: [00/07] -stable review

On 6/28/05, Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote:

> Responses should be made by Wed, Jun 29, 23:00 UTC.  Anything received after
> that time, might be too late.

Will the fix for the iptables physdev match go into -stable?

I'd regard the aesthetic objections as secondary in a stable kernel
series.  If physdev match stays in the kernel, the fix should IMHO go
into -stable.

Regards,
Jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [00/07] -stable review
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] Re: [00/07] -stable review
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [00/07] -stable review
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] xip cleanups
• Next by Date: [PATCH] really remove xattr_acl.h
• Previous by thread: [06/07] ACPI: Make sure we call acpi_register_gsi() even for default PCI interrupt assignment
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] Re: [00/07] -stable review
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]