Re: [PATCH] fix semaphore handling in __unregister_chrdev_region

Wen-chien Jesse Sung <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Maybe this up() should be down() instead?
> 
> ...
>  --- linux-2.6.12-git9.orig/fs/char_dev.c	2005-06-28 16:43:27.000000000 +0800
>  +++ linux-2.6.12-git9/fs/char_dev.c	2005-06-28 16:52:01.000000000 +0800
>  @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ __unregister_chrdev_region(unsigned majo
>   	struct char_device_struct *cd = NULL, **cp;
>   	int i = major_to_index(major);
>   
>  -	up(&chrdevs_lock);
>  +	down(&chrdevs_lock);

Heck.  Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] fix semaphore handling in __unregister_chrdev_region
    • From: Wen-chien Jesse Sung <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] fix semaphore handling in __unregister_chrdev_region
• Next by Date: Re: linux 2.6.12 and IOWAIT
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] fix semaphore handling in __unregister_chrdev_region
• Next by thread: sysfs abuse in recent i2o changes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]