On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:37:11PM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> have neither prof.[ch], nor spinprof.[ch] and we removed already some
> debugging code from spin_macros.h.
Yes, i was looking at some older tree with reiser4. Sorry, just
ignore what is already done.
But still spin_macros.h should be completely removed imho. Such
custom lock wrappers are strongly discouraged because it
makes it hard for others to read your code.
> > statcnt.h: This is completely useless because you don't align
> > the individual fields for cache lines - so you will still
> > have false sharing everywhere. Also using NR_CPUS is nasty
> > because it can be very big - num_possible_cpus() is better.
> > It should use the new dynamic per cpu allocator.
> >
> statcnt.h is already removed.
Great.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
