Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:43, Peter Williams wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > This patch improves throughput with the smp nice balancing code. Many
> > thanks to Martin Bligh for the usage of his regression testing bed to
> > confirm the effectiveness of various patches.
>
> Con,
> 	This doesn't build on non SMP systems due to the migration_thread field
> only being defined for SMP.  Attached is a copy of a slightly modified
> PlugSched version of the patch which I used to fix the problem in
> PlugSched.  Even though it's for a different file it should be easy to
> copy over.

Peter

Look at the actual patch I sent out you'll see it moved the ifdefs up to 
compensate. I believe your port of my patch doesn't build and I suspect it's 
because you missed these ifdef movements ;)

Cheers,
Con

Attachment: pgpRgx7s4lxc4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
• Next by Date: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: consider migration thread with smp nice
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]