Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers

On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:41:01AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Theoretically, dotest should work just fine even if you use Cogito.
> Anyone tested it?

	When I update the OCFS2 git tree, I clone with Cogito and patch
with dotest.  Been doing it for a month or two, no problems.

Joel

-- 

"I think it would be a good idea."  
        - Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western
          civilization

Joel Becker
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Oracle
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    • From: Petr Baudis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PATCH: IDE - sensible probing for PCI systems
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix the error handling in direct I/O
• Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
• Next by thread: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]