Re: Fwd: [Bug 4774] e1000 driver works on UP, but not SMP x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



here's what happens.

happy1-p:~# ifconfig eth11 192.168.255.1
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Invalid argument
happy1-p:~# tail -3 /var/log/messages
Jun 24 15:14:01 happy1-p /USR/SBIN/CRON[392]: (root) CMD (touch /tmp/.crond_running >/dev/null 2>/dev/null) Jun 24 15:14:22 happy1-p kernel: request_irq: IRQ requested is greater than NR_IRQs! Jun 24 15:14:22 happy1-p kernel: e1000: eth11: e1000_up: Unable to allocate interrupt Error: -22

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:57:13 +0400
From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
To: David Lang <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: [Bug 4774] e1000 driver works on UP, but not SMP x86_64

David, please try this debugging patch.

You can also register at http://bugme.osdl.org/createaccount.cgi and add
yourself to CC list.

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: [Bug 4774] e1000 driver works on UP, but not SMP x86_64
Date: Saturday 25 June 2005 01:27
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4774


------- Additional Comments From [email protected]  2005-06-24 14:27 -------
Created an attachment (id=5211)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=5211&action=view)
Debugging patch

That e1000 error message indicates an EINVAL error code, which is from this
code:

	if ((irqflags & SA_SHIRQ) && !dev_id)
		return -EINVAL;
	if (irq >= NR_IRQS)
		return -EINVAL;
	if (!handler)
		return -EINVAL;

I don't think it's the last one, because e1000_intr (which is sent in to
request_irq() from e1000) is prototyped/defined. I spun up a patch to spit out
some debugging here which simply inserts some printks (if the only driver which
gets this warning is e1000, then it shouldn't flood your logs) -- basically
narrowing down which error condition is causing the failure. I'm guessing it's
probably the first case, but let's be sure.


--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
 -- C.A.R. Hoare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux