Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Martin J. Bligh <[email protected]> wrote:

> > -	/*
> > -	 * In the NUMA case we dont use the TSC as they are not
> > -	 * synchronized across all CPUs.
> > -	 */
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
> > -	if (!use_tsc)
> > -#endif
> > +	if (!cpu_has_tsc)
> >  		/* no locking but a rare wrong value is not a big deal */
> >  		return jiffies_64 * (1000000000 / HZ);
> 
> Humpf. That does look dangerous on a NUMA-Q. The TSCs aren't synced, 
> and we can't use them .... have to use PIT, whether the CPUs have TSC 
> or not.

is the only problem the unsyncedness? That should be fine as far as the 
scheduler is concerned. (we compensate for per-CPU drifts)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux