Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers

On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:41:01AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Cool. Except where the concepts are just different, Cogito mostly
> appears at least equally simple to use as Mercurial. Yes, some features
> are missing yet. I hope to fix that soon. :-)

The user interface and network protocol isn't the big deal, the big deal
is the more efficient on-disk storage format IMHO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    • From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
    • From: Petr Baudis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/4] files: change fd_install assertion
• Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
• Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
• Next by thread: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]