Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)

>It's a GBD replacement and is not fully open source.

What is not open source in it ()?

>KDB is at present more capable. It has a lot of promise, but it does not 
>have the all the architectural
>features necessary to replace either KDB or GDB at present.

While I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately saw missing...

Jan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
    • From: jmerkey <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
    • From: "Clyde Griffin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
    • From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
    • From: jmerkey <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction
• Next by Date: Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
• Previous by thread: Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
• Next by thread: Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]