Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Dipankar Sarma wrote:

> Do we really need to do a distributed reference counter implementation
> inside dst cache code ? If you are willing to wait for a while,
> we should have modified Rusty's bigref implementation on top of the 
> interleaving dynamic per-cpu allocator. We can look at distributed 
> reference counter for dst refcount then and see how that can be 
> worked out.

Is that code available somewhere?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
    • From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
    • From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
• Next by Date: [PATCH] driver core: Add the ability to unbind drivers to devices from userspace
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]