Re: [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction

From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:04:52 -0700 (PDT)

> The patch also removes the atomic_dec_and_test in dst_destroy.

That is the only part of this patch I'm willing to entertain
at this time, as long as Herbert Xu ACKs it.  How much of that
quoted %3 gain does this change alone give you?

Also, please post networking patches to [email protected].
Because you didn't, the majority of the networking maintainers
did not see your dst patch submissions.  It's mentioned in
linux/MAINTAINERS for a reason:

	NETWORKING [GENERAL]
	P:	Networking Team
	M:	[email protected]
	L:	[email protected]
	S:	Maintained

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: cfq misbehaving on 2.6.11-1.14_FC3
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]