Re: [patch 1/1] selinux: minor cleanup in the hooks.c:file_map_prot_check() code

On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 04:04 +0200, Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro
wrote:
> El mié, 22-06-2005 a las 21:55 -0400, James Morris escribió:
> > Please send SELinux kernel patches via the maintainers.
> 
> It was sent to Stephen during the development of the execstack and
> execheap permission checks patches, but it's up to him to decide about
> it right now.
> 
> Stephen, is it OK for you?

James is correct that the first diff isn't useful (and will lead to
warnings on ppc32), whereas the latter diff is a legitimate cleanup.  So
I'd suggest resubmitting with just the latter diff.  Thanks.  Sorry for
any confusion.
 
-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch 1/1] selinux: minor cleanup in the hooks.c:file_map_prot_check() code
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/1] selinux: minor cleanup in the hooks.c:file_map_prot_check() code
    • From: Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
• Next by Date: Re: Possible spin-problem in nanosleep()
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] selinux: minor cleanup in the hooks.c:file_map_prot_check() code
• Next by thread: Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]