El mié, 22-06-2005 a las 22:03 -0400, James Morris escribió: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, James Morris wrote: > > > > @@ -2485,7 +2487,7 @@ static int selinux_file_mprotect(struct > > > * check ability to execute the possibly modified content. > > > * This typically should only occur for text relocations. > > > */ > > > - int rc = file_has_perm(current, vma->vm_file, FILE__EXECMOD); > > > + rc = file_has_perm(current, vma->vm_file, FILE__EXECMOD); > > > if (rc) > > > return rc; > > > } > > > _ > > > Actually, this one's ok. OK, thanks. I'll wait for Stephen to review it and then decide what to do. Cheers, -- Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <[email protected]> [1024D/6F2B2DEC] & [2048g/9AE91A22][http://tuxedo-es.org]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] vm early reclaim orphaned pages (take 2)
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] selinux: minor cleanup in the hooks.c:file_map_prot_check() code
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] selinux: minor cleanup in the hooks.c:file_map_prot_check() code
- Index(es):
 |