On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:38:27PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Bare in mind here that what we're trying to find out with such
> tests is what is the bare minimum cost of the proposed rt
> enhancements to Linux, and how well do these perform in their
> rt duties, the most basic of which being interrupt latency.
Agreed. I think it makes more sense to keep comparing it against the UP
kernel with preempt disabled, since most embedded devices aren't smp.
> To be honest, however, I have a very hard time, as a user, to
> convince myself that I should enable preempt_rt under any but
> the most dire situations given the results I now have in front
Same here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
