Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (fuse)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >  We could.  But that would again be overly restrictive.  The goal is to
> > >  make the use of FUSE filesystems for users as simple as possible.  If
> > >  the user has to manage multiple namespaces, each with it's own
> > >  restrictions, it's becoming a very un-user-friendly environment.
> > 
> > I'd have thought that it would be possible to offer the same user interface
> > as you currently have with private namespaces.  Hide any complexity in the
> > userspace tools?  Where's the problem?
> 
> Sorry, I don't get it.

I'm asking you to expand on what the problems would be if we were to
enhance the namespace code as suggested.  What's the "very un-user-friendly
environment", and why cannot it be made more friendly with appropriate
support tools?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux