Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (configfs)

David Teigland <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 6/21/05, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > git-ocfs
> > 
> >     The OCFS2 filesystem.  OK by me, although I'm not sure it's had enough
> >     review.
> 
> Does this include configfs?  I'd especially like to see that sooner
> rather than later.

There's not a lot of point in adding a fs which has no in-kernel users.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (configfs)
    • From: David Teigland <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] devfs: remove devfs from Kconfig preventing it from being built
• Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
• Previous by thread: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (configfs)
• Next by thread: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]