Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  Or I can wait until you go next.  I didn't want these patches in the -mm
> >  tree as they would have caused you too much work to keep up to date and
> >  not conflict with anything else due to the size of them.
> 
> What happens if we merge it and then the storm of complaints over the
> ensuing four weeks makes us say "whoops, shouldna done that [yet]"?

so... disable the config option now. then wait 3 weeks. then do the
rest ;)

undoing the config change is easy compared to undoing the rest...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
• Next by Date: Re: e1000 driver works on UP, bt not SMP x86_64 (2.6.7 -2.6.12)
• Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
• Next by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]