ALSA: Is CONFIG_SND_DEBUG_MEMORY really required?

Hi,

I was a bit surprised to discover that ALSA has it's own memory 
debugging infrastructure.

Is there a reason why CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB isn't good enough for ALSA?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ALSA: Is CONFIG_SND_DEBUG_MEMORY really required?
    • From: Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (wireless)
• Next by Date: Re: ALSA: Is CONFIG_SND_DEBUG_MEMORY really required?
• Previous by thread: (2.6.12) is there any reason for alarm() call to add 1 to the returned value?
• Next by thread: Re: ALSA: Is CONFIG_SND_DEBUG_MEMORY really required?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]