Hi,
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> it seems you don't like the patch for some personal reasons, and now your are
> trying to find arguments against it.
Please stop trying such mind reading tricks.
> > fix it first, if the current system is a mess clean it up first, but
> > don't mix these two steps, unless you want to introduce more broken mess.
>
> If you introduce something new (higher resolution clock), you should start with
> something clean. Just hacking it in the first attempt, anf then making it
> beautiful in a second attempt is a waste of time IMHO.
Well, I'm not really convinced of the quality of the patch, if nobody can
explain it to me and I don't think my questions were that unreasonable.
We are talking about a core subsystem here, which IMO justifies a little
more care. Maybe you should follow the fs development a bit for an example
how to do even large changes in relatively simple steps.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]