On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote: > I'm seeing the message: > > bad: scheduling while atomic! > > I see this dozens of times when I'm writing to a nand flash device using a > vendor-provided driver from Compulab in 2.6.8.1. Does this mean the driver > has a bug or is incompatible with the preemptive configuration option? How > bad is "bad"? Should I turn of the preemption option, ignore the message, > or what? can you post the sourcecode of the driver? it needs fixing...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
- From: "David L" <[email protected]>
- Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
- References:
- bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
- From: "David L" <[email protected]>
- bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?
- Next by Date: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
- Previous by thread: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
- Next by thread: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?
- Index(es):