Re: [netfilter-core] Re: [PATCH] Avoid unncessary checksum validation in TCP/UDP netfilter

Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27 May 2005, at 12:20, Phil Oester wrote:
>> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:03:08PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>
>>> The TCP/UDP connection-tracking code in netfilter validates the
>>> checksum of incoming packets, to prevent nastier errors further down
>>> the road. This check is unnecessary if the skb is marked as
>>> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
>>
>> It seems at least part of this has already been merged in 2.6.12-rc
> 
> It would be great if the UDP code also would observe
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. I'll wait for 2.6.12 to appear and then submit a
> new patch if UDP has been missed.

TCP was changed to fix a regression with loopback packets. I've added
the UDP part of your patch to my 2.6.13 tree.

Regards
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Avoid unncessary checksum validation in TCP/UDP netfilter
    • From: Keir Fraser <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Avoid unncessary checksum validation in TCP/UDP netfilter
    • From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Avoid unncessary checksum validation in TCP/UDP netfilter
    • From: Keir Fraser <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.)
• Next by Date: ld bug
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Avoid unncessary checksum validation in TCP/UDP netfilter
• Next by thread: Resend: PATCH: Stop 2.6.12rc rmmod from being able to destroy CD hardware
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]