On Gwe, 2005-05-27 at 22:19, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Patch untested, but at least the code isn't obviously wrong now...
The abort code check of cmd->serial_number is the only thing I can see
that needs care and that looks safe by the time we hit eh_abort because
the mid level has quiesced the request queue.
eh_reset is whacking on requests but they are the IDE layer requests so
I suspect you want to simply drop the scsi locks for the eh functions
much earlier and use spin_lock_irqsave/restore on the ide lock ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
