Re: Playing with SATA NCQ

• To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Playing with SATA NCQ
• From: Michael Thonke <[email protected]>
• Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 23:40:24 +0200
• Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=YgHq9T2g6tdr9/c6Bkqe34UhFgo3NkWlHjfVpQISh3OtrpPzFycvbNER7pzi5xUrnRYIc/gs5pnZz5fkAJPHonTj2gCJqSAXd2kypXE8NAiruvIEVcoR2HtFIhFMxE+eDtCuq0zqTETP+b5m3kXzArwh90soT/gYxyAehHfhZDk=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050523)

Hello Jens,

I tried to play with your patch on ICH6R and ICH7R chipset also on
Sil3124R Controller
with 2xSamsung HD160JJ SATAII drives. But the performance gain stay out..
anything special to set to get it working? I used a vanilla-kernel
2.6.12-rc5-git2 for it.

Thanks for assistance/help

Greets
    Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Playing with SATA NCQ
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Playing with SATA NCQ
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
• Next by Date: [PATCH] e1000: NUMA aware allocation of descriptors V2
• Previous by thread: Re: Playing with SATA NCQ
• Next by thread: Re: Playing with SATA NCQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]