Will __pa(vmalloc()) ever work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have a driver that calls __pa() on an address obtained via vmalloc(). This is not supposed to work, and yet oddly it appears to. Is there a possibility, even a remote one, that __pa() will return the correct physical address for a buffer returned by the vmalloc() function?

Also, does the pgd/pmd/pte page-table walking work on addresses returned by kmalloc(), or do I have to use __pa() to get the physical address?

--
Timur Tabi
Staff Software Engineer
[email protected]

One thing a Southern boy will never say is,
"I don't think duct tape will fix it."
     -- Ed Smylie, NASA engineer for Apollo 13
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux