Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?

On Fri, 27 May 2005, Mikael Pettersson wrote:

> The only issue AFAIK is that assemblers may only
> recognise the plain base-10 AAD syntax. No biggie.

 And actually gas has supported the explicit operand variations for "aad" 
and "aam" for a long time now.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
    • From: <[email protected]>
  • Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
    • From: Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RT patch acceptance
• Next by Date: Resend: PATCH: Stop 2.6.12rc rmmod from being able to destroy CD hardware
• Previous by thread: Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
• Next by thread: Re: 387 emulator hack - mutant AAD trick - any objections?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]