After porting this fixlet to UML:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@41791ab52lfMuF2i3V-eTIGRBbDYKQ
, I've also added a warning which should refuse compilation with insane values
for PREEMPT_ACTIVE... maybe we should simply move PREEMPT_ACTIVE out of
architectures using GENERIC_IRQS.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]>
---
linux-2.6.git-paolo/include/linux/hardirq.h | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN include/linux/hardirq.h~coherence-test-preempt-active include/linux/hardirq.h
--- linux-2.6.git/include/linux/hardirq.h~coherence-test-preempt-active 2005-05-25 00:59:11.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.git-paolo/include/linux/hardirq.h 2005-05-25 00:59:26.000000000 +0200
@@ -43,13 +43,17 @@
#define __IRQ_MASK(x) ((1UL << (x))-1)
#define PREEMPT_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(PREEMPT_BITS) << PREEMPT_SHIFT)
-#define HARDIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(HARDIRQ_BITS) << HARDIRQ_SHIFT)
#define SOFTIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(SOFTIRQ_BITS) << SOFTIRQ_SHIFT)
+#define HARDIRQ_MASK (__IRQ_MASK(HARDIRQ_BITS) << HARDIRQ_SHIFT)
#define PREEMPT_OFFSET (1UL << PREEMPT_SHIFT)
#define SOFTIRQ_OFFSET (1UL << SOFTIRQ_SHIFT)
#define HARDIRQ_OFFSET (1UL << HARDIRQ_SHIFT)
+#if PREEMPT_ACTIVE < (1 << (HARDIRQ_SHIFT + HARDIRQ_BITS))
+#error PREEMPT_ACTIVE is too low!
+#endif
+
#define hardirq_count() (preempt_count() & HARDIRQ_MASK)
#define softirq_count() (preempt_count() & SOFTIRQ_MASK)
#define irq_count() (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK))
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
