>>>>> On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:51:45 -0700, Rusty Lynch <[email protected]> said:
Rusty> The following patch is for the 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 + my previous
Rusty> "Kprobes ia64 cleanup" patch that fixes a bug where a kprobe still
Rusty> fires when the instruction is predicated off. So given the p6=0,
Rusty> and we have an instruction like:
Rusty> (p6) move loc1=0
Rusty> we should not be triggering the kprobe. This is handled by
Rusty> carrying over the qp section of the original instruction into
Rusty> the break instruction.
What about:
(p6) cmp.eq.unc p9,p10=rX,rY
would the code handle that right? Similary, you may want to check for
the correct handling of instructions that cannot be predicated (such
as "cover").
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
