---- Original Message -----
From: "Al Viro" <[email protected]>
To: "Pekka J Enberg" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Anton Altaparmakov" <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 03:04
Subject: Re: ntfs: remove redundant assignments
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:21:46AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 22:10 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > >This is not. memset(0) is not the same as = NULL IMO. I don't care if
> > >the compiler thinks it is the same. NULL does not have to be 0 so I
> > >prefer to initialize pointers explicitly to NULL. Even more so since
this
> > >code is not performance critical at all so I prefer clarity here.
FWIW, a series of explicit assignments to zero puffs up the code on x86.
Several GCC releases using the default kernel -O2 build are too dumb to zero
EAX, or some other reg, and assign using it, so you're looking at 4 bytes of
immediate zero plus opcode ModRm/SIB. If the locations being assigned
happened to be statics you can often wind up with a 10 byte instruction to
zero a single dword somewhere.
I have tried a few tricks trying to get GCC to not use this 4 byte immediate
0 in non speed critical areas all to no avail (ex. foo &= 0; the AND
instruction can use a one byte sign extended operand, but GCC morphs
something like " &= 0" into a straight up "MOV thing,imm32" instruction)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
