Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:

Mercurial is ammenable to rsync provided you devote a read-only
repository to it on the client side. In other words, you rsync from
kernel.org/mercurial/linus to local/linus and then you merge from
local/linus to your own branch. Mercurial's hashing hierarchy is
similar to git's (and Monotone's), so you can sign a single hash of
the tree as well.


Ok fine. It's also interesting how you already enabled partial transfers
through http.

Please apply this patch so it doesn't fail on my setup ;)

--- mercurial-0.4b/hg.~1~	2005-04-29 02:52:52.000000000 +0200
+++ mercurial-0.4b/hg	2005-04-30 00:53:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#!/usr/bin/python
+#!/usr/bin/env python
 #
 # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM
 # v0.4b "oedipa maas"

Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries.

--
   -bill davidsen ([email protected])
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux