Re: [PATCH] resource release cleanup in net/

On 4/30/05, Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Since Andrew merged the patch that makes calling crypto_free_tfm() with a
> NULL pointer safe into 2.6.12-rc3-mm1, I made a patch to remove checks for
> NULL before calling that function, and while I was at it I removed similar
> redundant checks before calls to kfree() and vfree() in the same files.
> There are also a few tiny whitespace cleanups in there.

Jesper, I'd suggest that you left whitespaces for a separate patch, it
is always,
IMHO, better to have as small a patch as possible for reviewing.

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH 0/4] resource release cleanup in net/ (take 2)
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] resource release cleanup in net/
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [x86_64] how worried should I be about MCEs?
• Next by Date: Re: HyperThreading, kernel 2.6.10, 1 logical CPU idle !!
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] resource release cleanup in net/
• Next by thread: [PATCH 0/4] resource release cleanup in net/ (take 2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]