On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:52:31AM +0300, Kai Makisara wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:16:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Gwe, 2005-04-29 at 05:20, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > Ok thats the bit I needed to know
> > > >
> > > > So, do you still object to this patch being accepted?
> > >
> > > Switched to CAP_SYS_RAWIO I don't. Its the wrong answer long term I
> > > suspect but its definitely a good answer for now.
> >
> > Switch it in both capable() calls in the patch? Kai, is this acceptable
> > to you also?
> >
> Yes. Using CAP_SYS_ADMIN here was wrong.
Ok, care to send a new patch that I can use for the next -stable kernel
release?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
