On 4/30/05, Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:21:52PM +0900, aq wrote:
> >
> > OK, here is another patch. It is up to Andrew to pick the approriate.
> > But I still prefer the first patch, which provides both consistency in
> > interface and configuration.
>
> We shall do out best to distribute info to places where it belongs.
> A much better approch would be to move all ext2 + ext3 stuff out in
> their respective directories.
> When modifying xfs (or ext2,ext3) no files outside their respective
> directories should in need to be touched - this would just impose
> additional burden doing parrallel development.
OK, I agree.
>
> About your modifications:
>
> Skipping the menu part is OK.
> While you are modifying Kconfig in xfs/ put a
>
> if XFS_FS
> ...
> endif
>
> around all config options expcept the one defining the XFS_FS option.
> This will fix menu identing.
Thanks for pointing this out. But the patch I posted is fair enough.
It just move one menu item around, and change nothing else. Are you
happy with it?
regards,
aq
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
