Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:40:31AM -0400, Sean wrote:
> There isn't anything preventing optomized transfer protocols for git. 

such a system might fall apart under load, converting on the fly from
git to network-optimized format sound quite expensive operation, even
ignorign the initial decompression of the payload. If something it
should be pre-converted to mercurial, so you checkout from mercurial and
you apply to local git.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
    • From: "Sean" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Spurious disk change detections interferes with disk access
• Next by Date: Re: which ioctls matter across filesystems
• Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
• Next by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]