On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:38:28 -0600
Grant Grundler <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suspect the MAP_* attribute/hint needs to be passed in together
> with the mmap call if any arch (ia64?) would return a different
> virtual address depending the attribute (e.g cached vs uncached).
The only problem could me getting the generic mmap() code to
properly pass the flag down into the driver, I seem to recall
that it either does an -EINVAL or masks out any flags which
are not in the standard set.
But then again this conflicts with what I remember seeing in the
XFree86 PCI support, in that IA64 passed in such a mmap() flag
to indicate a framebuffer like mapping that didn't need a guard-like
bit to be set.
Someone should look at the code to make sure :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
