Re: [01/07] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:47:33AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Alan Cox ([email protected]) wrote:
> > On Mer, 2005-04-27 at 18:46, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > > Don't see why this one is a critical bug.
> > > 
> > > I guess without it, modular nfsd has no syscall interface (for UML, or
> > > course).
> > 
> > And the trivial zero risk fix is to compile it in. Its hardly pressing
> 
> OK, let's drop it.

Dropped.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [00/07] -stable review
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • [01/07] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [01/07] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [01/07] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [01/07] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [01/07] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Rules about the -stable tree
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] dlm: overview
• Previous by thread: Re: [01/07] uml: add nfsd syscall when nfsd is modular
• Next by thread: Re: [00/07] -stable review
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]