Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386

* [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> 
> Split the i386 entry.S files into entry.S and syscall_table.S which
> is included in the previous one (so actually there is no difference between
> them) and use the syscall_table.S in the UML build, instead of tracking by
> hand the syscall table changes (which is inherently error-prone).

Xen can use this as well (it was on my todo list).

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386
    • From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Extremely poor umass transfer rates
• Next by Date: dumb question: How to create your own log files in a kernel module?
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386
• Next by thread: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]